Rule 96
Procedure Relating To The Order Of Punishment And Duplicate
(1) While taking decision for any departmental punishment against any Armed Police, the officer authorized to order punishment, by considering whether or not the sufficient opportunity was given to furnish clarifications or explanation to the concerned Armed Police and by reasonably evaluating all available material evidences, clarification and explanation, verdict shall be given by setting out clear reason thereof. The officer authorized to order punishment in such a manner shall have to take decision with his or her clear opinion regarding the
order for punishment.
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained elsewhere in this Chapter, no decision shall have to be taken giving another punishment after demanding the clarification, explanation by proposing one punishment to any Armed Police. Provided that, if it is required to give lesser or higher punishment due to any reason, the procedure as referred
to in Rules 92 and 94 shall have to be fulfilled again.
(3) While taking decision for giving departmental punishment to any Armed Police pursuant to Sub-rule (1), the officer authorized to order punishment shall not make decision with retrospective effect. Provided that in making decision in the case of an absconded one, decision may be made with effect from the date of absconding.
(4) One duplicate copy of the order of departmental punishment made to any Armed Police pursuant to Sub-rule (1) shall have to be given to the concerned Armed Police by the Officer authorized to order punishment without any fee.
(5) If any Armed Police has been dismissed from the service pursuant to Sub-clause (2) of Clause (b) of Rule 84, the officer authorized to order punishment shall have to give the information, including the peculiarity with three generations, to the Armed Police Service Commission and Police Records Keeping Office, and the concerned agency shall also keep such information in its records.
order for punishment.
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained elsewhere in this Chapter, no decision shall have to be taken giving another punishment after demanding the clarification, explanation by proposing one punishment to any Armed Police. Provided that, if it is required to give lesser or higher punishment due to any reason, the procedure as referred
to in Rules 92 and 94 shall have to be fulfilled again.
(3) While taking decision for giving departmental punishment to any Armed Police pursuant to Sub-rule (1), the officer authorized to order punishment shall not make decision with retrospective effect. Provided that in making decision in the case of an absconded one, decision may be made with effect from the date of absconding.
(4) One duplicate copy of the order of departmental punishment made to any Armed Police pursuant to Sub-rule (1) shall have to be given to the concerned Armed Police by the Officer authorized to order punishment without any fee.
(5) If any Armed Police has been dismissed from the service pursuant to Sub-clause (2) of Clause (b) of Rule 84, the officer authorized to order punishment shall have to give the information, including the peculiarity with three generations, to the Armed Police Service Commission and Police Records Keeping Office, and the concerned agency shall also keep such information in its records.